The Non-Interactive Society

22/06/2012 14:07

The Non-Interactive Society

 

If women have a penis, and they do ( http://www.futanaria.com ), then the policy of non-interaction is their definitive mode. In the Moslem nations women are `hidden` behind the cloistered existences of the abiyah, which is a full length sack with eyeholes that prevents them from being seen or spoken with. In Western societies the norm is one woman one man although polygamy isn`t illegal, while In Arabia the rule is that each man can have four wives.

 

 

 In Hollywood a sight of the male penis is the main taboo of mainstream pictures, on `moral` grounds. However, because women have a penis, the taboo against its revealing is a prohibition against women`s being seen, which is `immoral` on moral grounds. Moslem societies are criticized for their non-interactivity, but women in the West are deactivated because they`re not able to function as a species with its own penis.

 

 

 In Claude Levi Strauss` structuralist anthropology the world is a phenomenological instruction kit. Milk is observed to curdle and produce cheese, for example. This is the model for inventiveness from man`s perspective. Vehicles are stable because they have four wheels, which derives its form from structuralist anthropological observations of a world in which most creatures have four legs. The idea of fourness is, therefore, a structuralist anthropological given in terms of nature, which is what structuralism is about.

 

 

 The structural anthropologists argue that the world is perceivable by the brain because it corresponds to the structure of the brain. The developmental psychology of Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) posits the `God archetype`, which exists as a natural facultas praeformandi that produces archetypes in dreams and imagination that are discernible in art and life as manifestations of the soul and spirit which seeks development and personal growth for the individual, or individuation.

 

 In simple terms, the phenomenological world is observable as inventive naturally, which is what men conceive as nature in their conservative approach towards reality, whereas the world of the soul, which is descried as spiritual produces archetypal phenomenon, which are natural but alien to the way that men think because they`re conservatively preventing women`s penis from emerging and being seen. Because men are a parasite due to their seeking to prevent women from knowing their own penis, and enslaving her as a `host womb` in which to be born and feed upon her as leeches, the fourfold marriage of Arabian society is an archetypal structuralist manifestation of the four functions of consciousness that Jung describes as being necessary for an individual`s perfect functionality.

 

 

 According to Jung, Thinking, Sensation, Feeling and Intuition are the four functions of consciousness, and the four wives of Moslem society correspond to the building of an individuated self from the perspective of the marrying, in the Shakespearian sense of `understanding`, central male who corresponds to the ego controlling the four functions. In short, the archetypal structure of the brain, which is natural and from nature, in women, and is perceivable as actuating spiritually in the phenomenological world, is not anthropological structuralist, which would correspond to the brains of men. In their concern with how to have nature produce so that they can feed upon it as parasitical organisms, men aren`t concerned with God because the archetypal structuralist female brain isn`t necessary for the production of bread and wine, for example, which can be `invented` simply by observing nature, whereas fourfold marriage can`t be presupposed from the natural world and so is a phenomenologically realized `spiritual` creation of God`s that, appearing in the natural world, has also arisen from it, which forms the basis for a perception of women as structuralist unifiers of nature.

 

 

 In Christianity, Jesus uses the bread and the wine, as high level products of civilization and culture, to indicate that soul and spirit are productive of `fellowship`. Bread and wine are structuralist anthropological, that is, they are naturally phenomenological and can be observed deriving simply from nature, which facilitates men`s feeding as parasites upon the Earth because they`re concerned with maintaining themselves through least effort. The soul, as the ultimately `emanatory` intellect of the archetypes of God`s spirit, insofar as the phenomenological world contains signs of them, is archetypal structuralist, or female. If women have a penis, and men don`t produce breast milk, then women`s selfless nurturing of their offspring is an archetypal stucturalist manifestation of God`s spirit in the phenomenological world, a `structuralist` sign of nature`s inventiveness and spirituality.

 

 

 From men`s structuralist anthropological point of view milk produces cheese, and women produce men, which means that men are parasites whereas women are producers. Because women are archetypal structuralist they`re developmental whereas men are stucturalist anthropological, which means that they`re parasitical. It`s the analogy of the fruit in the garden of Eden. Fruit is picked without effort, and men`s structuralist anthropological approach, determined by their brains, is to feed upon nature rather than assist it to develop spiritually, which is what breast-feeding women do with their milk.

 

 

 During Jesus` crucifixion he was given vinegar, which is rotten wine, and according to Levi-Strauss` structuralism vinegar is a higher form of culture than wine because, although grapes ferment to produce wine, and that`s structuralist anthropology insofar as its phenomenologically descryable by men and so implementable as a mass productive process, the sourness of vinegar tells us that fruit juice tastes better than wine and vinegar is consequently a symbol, in Jesus` crucifixion, of what`s wrong with men`s brains.  They`re rotten and crucify Jesus because they don`t want God to produce anything more difficult than a structuralist anthropological reality in which observation is inventive enough for men to live parasitically.

 

 Jesus was murdered because he was suggesting an archetypalist structuralist approach to production in which the victim wasn`t tortured to produce more, but produced because that`s what producers do. Because Woman is God`s producer, that is, everything comes from her enslaved `host womb`, men as her anthropological structuralist parasites would be frightened that Jesus` advocacy of the Holy Spirit as the `tutelary guide`, that is, the Shekinah or female spirit of the law from the Covenant with God in the Old Testament, would result in freedom for women to produce, as God`s chosen people, without men as her torturing parasites.

 

 In The Wasteland poem T.S. Eliot observed that the world had lost soul and spirit. Eliot posited that archetypal material existent within the psyche could be reactivated so that the soul and spirit of modernity could revivify life. A simple analogy is that of bars where alcohol is drunk, and Eliot refers to it specifically:

 

`When Lil's husband got demobbed, I said -

I didn't mince my words, I said to her myself,                        

HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME

Now Albert's coming back, make yourself a bit smart.

He'll want to know what you done with that money he gave you

To get yourself some teeth. He did, I was there.

You have them all out, Lil, and get a nice set,

He said, I swear, I can't bear to look at you.

And no more can't I, I said, and think of poor Albert,

He's been in the army four years, he wants a good time,

And if you don't give it him, there's others will, I said.

Oh is there, she said. Something o' that, I said.                      

Then I'll know who to thank, she said, and give me a straight look.

HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME

If you don't like it you can get on with it, I said.

Others can pick and choose if you can't.

But if Albert makes off, it won't be for lack of telling.

You ought to be ashamed, I said, to look so antique.

(And her only thirty-one.)

I can't help it, she said, pulling a long face,

It's them pills I took, to bring it off, she said.

(She's had five already, and nearly died of young George.)             

The chemist said it would be alright, but I've never been the same.

You are a proper fool, I said.

Well, if Albert won't leave you alone, there it is, I said,

What you get married for if you don't want children?

HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME

Well, that Sunday Albert was home, they had a hot gammon,

And they asked me in to dinner, to get the beauty of it hot -

HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME

HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME

Goonight Bill. Goonight Lou. Goonight May. Goonight.                   

Ta ta. Goonight. Goonight.

Good night, ladies, good night, sweet ladies, good night, good night..`

 

 The last line is from Shakespeare`s Hamlet in which Hamlet, Ophelia`s boyfriend, kills her father and she drowns herself after saying goodbye. If she`s  a species she doesn`t need them anyway. Eliot`s stanzas are concerned with the drowning of one`s self in alcohol, which has already reduced Lil to a toothless whore at 31 and Eliot`s refrain of `HURRY UP PLEASE IT`S TIME` relates to the need for a `spiritual` change, which would include the recognition by drunken Woman that she`s a species.

 

 

 The Wasteland contains the bars of the prison to which men go in order to rot their brains, practice rottenness and return to the bars of the prison to rot their brains. Women`s milk, like fruit juice, isn`t brain rotting, and neither is vinegar. But the Roman soldier gave Jesus vinegar at the crucifixion rather than water because he was rotten, although vinegar is actually sustaining of life. The soldier wanted to prolong Jesus` torture. Nature isn`t spiritually rotten, whereas alcoholic men and their brains are, which is why they imbibe the `demon drink`; they like to. It makes them more demoniacal.

 

 Apples can be picked from trees, and eaten. That`s `prison behavior` in accordance with perceptions of the structuralist anthropological phenomenology of nature as men`s prison. Vinegar, produced from fermented wine that`s left a little longer, may be used to sustain a victim under torture, and is rotten; but nature isn`t. In short, men prefer prison and torture because it`s easier; even though they may become the imprisoned and tortured.

 

 

 Britney Spears in a cage suggests that she`s a slave, whereas she`s a billionaire; but it`s the image that`s powerful and so the structural anthropologist observer doesn`t envision himself there. Consequently, going to the bars to rot their brains with alcohol so that they can live in the prison is what men do. Because they can`t see themselves living outside of the bars, but they can see Britney Spears on the inside of a cage during her Circus tour, which gives them the illusion of power. Or, as they say in the United Kingdom, when they go to the bars:

 

 `A couple of Britney Spears, please.`

 

 Inside the bars they can order beers, and understand that Britney Spears is a billionaire in a cage on her Circus tour, whereas they`re free to order `Britney Spears`, rot their brains with alcohol, and plan to torture the woman, as they tortured Jesus,  because of their alcohol fuelled delusion that she`s producing under torture while they`re free to imprison her and make her produce.

 

 

 Alfred Lord Tennyson`s In Memoriam contains the line `nature red I tooth and claw`, which relates to the nature philosopher and anthropologist Sir Charles Darwin`s Origin Of Species` thesis that `the fittest survive`, and that has been used by conservative ideologists to deny archetypal structuralism, that is, the development of women as a species with her own penis.  On structuralist anthropological grounds men perceive their brains superior because parasitical. Women`s brains are archetypal structuralist because developmental. Consequently, conservatism`s thesis that the `fittest survive` is, from an archetypal  structuralist perspective, rotten. Women`s breast milk is a natural sign that, because they have a penis of their own and are a species, they`re prevented from surviving by `conservative thinkers`. In political terms, the British Labour party`s name is archetypal structuralist, because it indicates `work` and `birth` rather than parasitism, whereas conservatism only preserves the parasite.

 

 Feminists, in subscribing to the theory of equality in socialism, perceive that homosexuals and lesbians are `politically correct` insofar as they`re `the same`, whereas homosexuals aren`t a species under development and lesbian women are the manifestation in the natural world of the spirit of God seeking physical and spiritual actuation for women as a species. In short, homosexuality isn`t politically sound feminist ideological thinking, because women`s brains aren`t the same as rotten homosexual conservatives who don`t want life, and who`ve given us their AIDS as a reification of their parasitical cannibalistic desire to devour Woman as the creature of which they`ve made an enslaved symbiote and which Revelation descries as precursing the woman `hidden` upon the Earth leaving for the stars to sow her `seed`, with her own penis, amongst the heavens prior to her final battle and defeat of the evil `seed` who receive a punishment of eternal unendurable pain as a consequence of their refusal to repent of their rotten parasitical cannibalism:

 

`Men gnawed their tongues in agony and cursed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, but they refused to repent of what they had done.` (Rev: 16.10)

 

 In political terms, socialism`s advocacy of sameness as a criteria for PC is, paradoxically, strengthened by conservatism`s advocacy of the superiority of men`s structuralist anthropological brains, amounting to conservatism`s unopposed  embracing of rottenness and parasitism as a political platform. Women`s espousal of socialist PC criteria means that they`ve accepted de facto inferiority because they don`t have a platform that`s archetypal structuralist enough to counteract the structuralist anthropological vision from the brains of men. To be sufficiently archetypal structuralist they`d have to deny that homosexuality is `the same` as lesbianism and promote themselves as the `soul species` of God`s spiritual Earth.

 

 

 Because there`s a spirit in nature which is developmental and not inert, nature isn`t merely biological, but psychological. When a woman has four wives in Arabia because she`s a species with her own penis it`ll be obvious that the archetypal structure of Jung`s four functioned psyche is phenomenologically present in the world and so the `God archetype` of nature`s spirit is as real as the structuralist anthropologically derived `invention` of drinking straws from reeds, which in fact amounts to parasitism rather than invention, because even a chimp can pick an apple from a tree. In other words, the God archetype doesn`t `invent`, it exists phenomenologically as a manifestation of the design of the creator for creativity from within the creation, which is why Eve is depicted as emerging from the side of Adam in Genesis. The Earth may be perceivable as phenomenologically presupposing anthropological structuralist `inventiveness` such as the `traffic light` where `red for danger` is structurally nature, but woman from the side of man is `inventive` and not presupposed by nature but, archetypal structuralist, developmental.

 

 

 In Saudi Arabia`s predominantly Sunni Moslem city of Al Riyadh, `the Garden`, green, orange, and red, in terms of their traffic light system`s `symbolic logic`, is perceivable as the `Red Sea` by which Joshua and Moses lost a fish, the symbol of Jesus, and which heralded the appearance of Khidr, the `green one`. In Moslem tradition there are Sunnis, which would be symbolized here by the sun as the orange daystar, and amber of the `traffic light`, and Shi`ites, who are different primarily because of their preference for particular Suras of the Koran, which was dictated to the Prophet Mohammed by angels, according to tradition, and is the holy book of the Moslem world. The story of Khidr is from Sura 18 and relates Khidr`s teaching of Moses by means of three stages that would also correspond to the red, orange and green of the `traffic light` symbolism. Khidr does three things that Moses doesn`t understand. He rebuilds a wall, kills someone and knocks a hole in a boat. Explaining, Khidr says he did all these things to prevent something evil from occurring, and escape. Moses doesn`t understand because he doesn`t. In the Talmud Moses is therefore given the law of God to obey so that he doesn`t have to understand. He does as he`s ordered to do. In simple terms, the traffic light is the law, which is structuralist anthropological, whereas Khidr is the wisdom that doesn`t need the law. Moses is stupid so he needs the law, which is for stupid people who use the law to tell wise people what to do, but that`s not what the law if for, and that`s why much Sharia law is criticized because it`s used by stupid people:

 

A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his "wife", after he was caught having sex with the animal.

 

The goat's owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.

They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.

"We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together," Mr Alifi said.

Mr Alifi, of Hai Malakal in Upper Nile State, told the Juba Post newspaper that he heard a loud noise around midnight on 13 February and immediately rushed outside to find Mr Tombe with his goat.

"When I asked him: 'What are you doing there?', he fell off the back of the goat, so I captured and tied him up."

Mr Alifi then called elders to decide how to deal with the case.

"They said I should not take him to the police, but rather let him pay a dowry for my goat because he used it as his wife," Mr

Alifi told the newspaper. 1

 
Map of Sudan
 

 The meaning of the traffic light is that the law helps people to go forward, whereas the wise person goes forward in understanding.  Moslem societies, on the whole, are sensible. When asked about `worship`, the Prophet Mohammed said: `I fast and I eat, I pray and I sleep, and I marry women.` Mohammed`s precept was `do good` and, when asked about Mohammed, his wife Ayesha said `His character was the Koran.`2 Most Moslem`s would observe that the Sudanese man needed a wife and not a goat.

 

 From a Jungian perspective, four wives, which is the number feasible in Moslem culture, is archetypally developmental because it corresponds to the number of the functions of consciousness. In Jungian terms, a woman with a penis with four wives would, archetypally, be God in the natural phenomenology of the world. This suggests that, although previously men`s structural anthropological parasitism has imposed itself upon the world, and what we are able to see of it is what remains from their enslaving of women as a `host womb`, the archetypal structuralist perspective is God`s, who is omnipotent, and can`t be denied forever. Men don`t want God because they want parasitism. Like paratroopers landing on the roof of your house to steal the family silver, it`s because they don`t have any and it seems easier in the short term; but God isn`t.

 

 

 Jesus` teaching presupposes culture and civilization in the form of corn and grapes being transformed by structural anthropological inventiveness, that is, bread and wine are phenomenologically derivable from a perfunctory study of nature by men. The story of the serpent in Eden is that of the parasite that observes the apple can be plucked from the tree without effort, and so advises Eve to take the fruit of the `fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil`, which results in her expulsion from the garden. Henceforth Eve experiences the pain of childbirth and has to obtain what she needs by the `sweat of her brow`. The history of civilization and culture is of men`s desire to obtain what they want without working, and the infestation of women`s wombs by men is a manifestation of that parasitical desire. In other words, the story of Eve from Eden is that of the woman`s enslavement, and Adam is her torturer.

 

 Jesus` offering of the bread and the wine to the disciples in fellowship precedes his torture and murder by men who represent the structuralist anthropological approach to production. From a structuralist anthropological reading of nature it`s possible for the parasites to discover how to make bread and wine. However, wine requires more observation insofar as it`s rotten fruit. Held up as a mark of civilization and culture it actually denotes the `mark of the beast`,3 because the structuralist anthropological brains of men view the producer as their victim, symbolized at the crucifixion scene by Jesus being given vinegar to sustain life so that the torturers can continue. In simple terms, the anthropological structuralist method is to torture the soul and spirit of nature so that it produces more of itself, so that it produces more of itself ...  The solution to this is the archetypal structuralist approach to development, which is that the spirit of God and the soul of Womankind are a unity that works together for production without parasitism.

 

 

 In the 1961 science fiction story Stranger In A Strange Land by Robert A. Heinlein (1907-88) the central protagonist Michael Valentine Smith is torn apart by a mad crowd in a Christ-like scene at the close of the book. His body is eaten by his disciples in a symbolic meal reminiscent of Jesus words about the bread and the wine: `This is my body and my blood.` Because women are a species with their own penis, their devourment of Smith isn`t cannibalism, whereas men`s eating of his body is, which means that, in terms of the production process, the parasites that are men are cannibals. Or, in other words, they should eat each other.

 

 In biology the AIDS virus is largely perceived as a homosexual disease deriving from monkeys, and AIDS lives by fooling the immune system into thinking that it`s a white cell from the immune system that attacks and destroys foreign bodies which would kill red blood cells. In fooling the body into believing it’s a part of the immune stytem`s defences, the AIDS virus kills the defending white cells and stops the body from living. Men are similarly parasitical cannibals that, fooling the `host womb` of the body of women, are an infestation replicating itself upon the Earth with her destruction or devourment as its teleological aim. In other words, men are a virus and women are a species with their own penis, but they`re susceptible to deception by men`s `camouflage`, which is the penis they have, in faith, from a developmentally archetypal structuralist `mother nature` or Spirit of God, which is spiritually present in Womankind as the archetypes, but not logically and necessarily present in men whose brains seem structuralist anthropological rather than archetypally developmental.

 

 In effect men are imprisoned by their structuralist anthropologically determined brains, which preclude them from being anything other than parasites; because they are. As a virus, AIDS is a structuralist anthropological manifestation of men`s killing of the women in the cells of their prison, which is the Earth. The solution to AIDS is archetypal structuralist, that is, the discovery by someone, with enough feminine soul or spirit from nature, of a cure derived from imagination. But structuralist anthropological men`s brains perceive that the solution is to torture the genius to produce a cure, and then continue torturing:

 

`Men gnawed their tongues in agony and cursed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, but they refused to repent of what they had done.` (Rev: 16.10)

 

It`s a feature of replicating diseases that they kill themselves in killing the body they replicate within. Consequently, men are women`s disease because men have adopted structuralist anthropological nature as a methodological paradigm for the easiest route of parasitism upon women and the phenomenological natural environment which, because men are the torturers of women and nature as their victim, tells them that all they have to do is enslave the `host womb` of the planetary species, torture it to make it produce, and pick off its fruit from its developed branches while preventing it from any developmental functioning that would allow its escaping them, which is what the Bible ends with insofar as the escaping `hidden` woman of the Earth is given a new heaven and Earth by God for her `seed` while the evil receive perdition.

 

 If women are a species, and men are parasitical cannibals which seek to devour her and the Earth because they`ve achieved symbiosis with her flesh, then it explains why they`re gnawing on their own tongues. As cannibals, they`d be presupposed to. Similarly, as homosexual parasites that aren`t a species, but like the ancient Greek pederasts merely using women to replicate themselves, they`re supposed to die of their own diseases (AIDS, cannibalism) rather than give it to women, who are archetypal structuralist, and whose white cells mirror the milk their breasts produce for their baby, Womankind, as naturally and incontrovertibly pure.

 

 

 Aryan thinking has often been criticized for racism, but the whiter the cells, the whiter the spunk, and the whiter the milk, the purer the species of Womankind. This is a truism that applies to perception of women as a species with her own penis, and so the `Aryan path` is the path of the species of Woman. In simple terms, black babes with healthy white cells, testicles full of white spunk, and tits full of white milk are Aryan women, and it has nothing to do with colour of skin or creed:

 

`.. a nucleus of universal brotherhood of humanity, without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or color; to study ancient and modern religions, philosophies, and sciences, and to demonstrate the importance of such study.`4

 

 The obvious problem with the Aryan path is that, in presupposing brotherhood, sisterhood is precluded because that presupposes brotherly and sisterly relations between a parasitical non-species, that is, men, and a species, that is, women with their own penis. In simple terms, men are `hoods` and Womankind is a better description of what humanity should be. This explains why the Nazis  were `hoods` who, in their brotherly way, exterminated 6,000,000, Jews. Judaism presupposes that, as one can only be a Jew if born from a woman, so Jews can only be women. Nazism, in exterminating Jews, presupposes that women are produced for men`s cannibalistic devouring of its symbiote.

 

 

 The whiter the woman, the closer she approximates to men`s target of destroying the white cell`s of the body of Womankind by means of themselves as a virus that corresponds, in structuralist anthropological terms, to AIDS. Nazism`s advocacy of the creation of white blonde ubermenschen on their `love farms` was merely a device to get closer to white blonde Woman and exterminate her as a species with her own penis. Because the `Aryan path` is Woman`s penis` path, the Nazis extermination of the Jews was men`s parasitical `behaviouralist` phenomenology. Judaism defines Jews as women, insofar as Jews can only be born from women, so Woman is God`s developing `chosen` species, which the Nazis didn`t want and so exterminated her in their concentration camps at Belsen and Auschwitz et al. The final conclusion would have to be that men aren`t human, because their `final solution` to women as a species is visibly all they`re preoccupied with.

 

 

1 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4748292.stm

 

2 Characteristics of The Prophet, National Guard, The Organisation of Religious Guidance and Moral Direction, Prepared By: Educational Department in Madar Al-Watan, Saudi Arabia, 2006, http://www.madar-alwatan.com

 

3 The mark of the murderer Cain in Genesis and which is used to identify men in Revelation by the simple expedient of observing that `the number of a man is the number of the beast`, that is, men are beasts.

 

4 Indo-Asian Culture, Vol. 20, Indian Council For Cultural Relations, January 1, 1971, p.86.